In 1984, Ghostbusters exploded onto our screens and left an indelible imprint on generations of kids, including me. The spook-zapping comedy had everything: the car, the special effects, the quotable dialogue ("Mass hysteria!").
So, as belated sequel/tribute Ghostbusters: Afterlife updates the phantasm-fighting foursome for a new generation, I once again joined Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Ernie Hudson and Harold Ramis in Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters 2 to see if bustin' still makes me feel good.
It absolutely does. And a few things jumped out at me like a legion of ghosts terrorizing New York. All together now: If there's something strange in your neighborhood, who ya gonna call?
window.CnetFunctions.logWithLabel('%c One Trust ', "IFrame loaded: iframe_youtube with class optanon-category-3");
There are surprisingly few ghosts in Ghostbusters
They ain't afraid of no ghosts, but the filmmakers apparently couldn't afford many specters either. Ghostbusters features only four actual ghosts on screen: the library ghost at the start; the ugly little spud that came to be known as Slimer; a winged ghost that pops out of the subway; and an undead cab driver. Well, we assume that was a ghost; have you ever been in a New York taxi?
There are two sequences in which ghosts are supposed to have overrun the city, but due to restrictions on money and time for special effects, the events are shown through newspaper headlines and via people running around screaming rather than through actual onscreen apparitions. Of course, the effects we do see are more than memorable. Between Gozer, Mr. Stay-Puft, and the terror dogs, there are plenty of extra-dimensional beings to keep the boys busy.
The Ghostbusters are a startup
The Ghostbusters are a bunch of academics who spot an underserved niche and 바카라사이트추천 found a company to monetize their research. They're a startup! They even have a wacky headquarters and a cool logo. They're also hamstrung by intrusive government regulation, which could be why Ghostbusters is popular with conservatives.
/>
/>
/>
/>
/>
/>
/>
/> scriptpt type="text/plain" class="optanon-category-3">
/> window.CnetFunctions.logWithLabel('%c One Trust ', "IFrame loaded: iframe_youtube with class optanon-category-3"
/>
/>
/>
/>
Where there's smoke...
Those guys smoke... a lot. Hey, it was the '80s, when characters in kids' movies could smoke it up and make jokes about supernatural fellatio.
Wait, what?
Ghostbusters 2 isn't as bad as you think
The 1989 sequel may not be held in as high regard -- part 2 earns a Metacritic score of 56 compared with the first movie's 71, and even director Ivan Reitman regrets the Statue of Liberty gag. But it's still a fun watch. Sure, the mayor stuff is a bit repetitive and the music's a bit dated, but there's still so much good stuff here. Bill Murray is every bit as slyly charming. The mood slime is fun. The courtroom sequence is fantastic. Janine and Louis are cute. Egon gets his best moment in the series ("Doh... Ray... Egon!"). And the villains are every bit as good as the first film's bad guys.
Soon, the city will be mine and Vigo's... mainly Vigo's
Peter MacNicol is a scene-stealing delight in Ghostbusters 2 as Janosz, the twitchy, creepy Renfield to Vigo's Dracula. In fact, MacNicol played that exact role a few years later in the Mel Brooks comedy Dracula: Dead and Lovin' It.
/>
/> scriptpt type="text/plain" class="optanon-category-3">
/>window.CnetFunctions.logWithLabel('%c One Trust ', "IFrame loaded: iframe_youtube with class optanon-category-3"
/>
/>
/>