Cancer Fund raising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure may be obtained. The Council organizes special occasions like Concert for a Cause and lots of more to help with ongoing research. The idea is fun and people may have more knowledge concerning how to prevent dig this disease. Fund raising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost.

There are numerous ways that you may help to raise more funds. Car donations are an effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program.

Research Fundraising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure may be obtained. The Council organizes special occasions like Concert for a Cause and many more. The idea is fun and people can have more knowledge on the way to prevent cancer. Fundraising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost. There are several ways that you could help to raise more funds. Car donations are an effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program. Cancer Research Fundraising includes Marathon-For-A-Cause. 80% of the proceeds will go to Cancer Research. Magazines and booklets are usually a division of the fundraising program.

As the use of parachutes is usually limited to purely volunteer activities, as with posting the colors by dropping from the sky onto the field of an athletic event, you will discover much more serious applications that beg to be addressed. For years, brave paratroopers happen to be mandated to risk their lives by using these unproven devices. One interesting result is the fact that commercial airlines have refused to issue parachutes to their passengers as well as for good reason. One aviation expert, speaking on condition of anonymity, has stated flat out that his company will not assume the liability inherent in recommending the use of such untested devices for passengers.

There is obviously an immediate and urgent need to correct this deficiency in this particular major field of human endeavor. The perception that parachutes are of value is based strictly on anecdotal evidence. It really is a universally accepted axiom that evidence based conclusions, not supported by randomized clinical trials is sorely wanting. It will not seem at all unreasonable to proceed immediately to correct this sore deficiency that is so pervasive throughout the aviation industry.

A highly effective clinical trial that would put this controversy to rest immediately isn't going to seem to be beyond the bounds of reason and practicality. Roughly speaking, it could possibly be completed from a readily available test vehicle such as the old reliable C-130 aircraft. This craft has proven a workhorse across the globe and its credentials are impeccable. The whole sequence of events relating to the trial could be carried out in a matter of minutes, seconds should the need be. It need only involve a number of test subjects (patients, if need be to keep the terminology continuous), say 100, each of which may wear a parachute and jump out at the signal of the principal investigator (jump master in the vernacular). It should be noted that the specific number of these candidates could be wearing normal parachutes while a specific number, say 5 by way of example, would be wearing what appeared by all accounts to be normal parachutes but would, in reality, be packed with ordinary bed sheets. Neither the jumper, the jump master nor the airplane pilot would know which were the dummy packs. For the moment it's not essential to prescribe just what this number could be. This really is better left to a committee of mathematicians from the national Cancer Institute to find out what number of "paracebos" would provide the most conclusive data.

The opportunity for excellence in data reduction is manifold. For instance, beyond the mere morbidity statistics, we could envision varying degrees of injury, and even predict survival estimates for anyone who did not suffer the inconvenience of death at impact with the earth. This might conveniently provide gainful employment for hundreds of research technicians. Of-course there will be necessary and proper expenses. Surely the pilot and co-pilot should be rewarded handsomely for their participation, not forgetting the principal investigator (jump master). Probably the biggest expense of all would be the media blitz to recruit volunteers. It's to be expected that intense pressure has to be exerted to raise awareness on the requirement for such testing and lastly get these brave heroes to volunteer. A substantial call to their obligation to fellow air travelers world wide and their role as courageous scientists in a brave new venture should be sufficient. As a note on expenses, it must not be necessary to pay these brave souls anything as their participation in such a noble cause should, itself, be reward enough. Of course, they did get a zero cost ride on the airplane with complimentary light refreshments, free utilization of the parachute, free instruction from the jump master and a memorable descent to Mother Earth. What more could a reasonable participant ask? Financial support should be conveniently forthcoming from the likes of Boeing, Lockheed as well as the commercial airlines who stand to benefit greatly from the end result.